Even in Palm Springs

 

Palm Springs, California, is not a strange place to headline writers. All kinds of stories from this international resort region make the news, via celebrity sightings and their occasional misdeeds, Presidential visits, Coachella fashion, major golf and tennis tournaments, the odd wildfire and earthquake, and its lovely winter weather, spring sandstorms, and 120-degree heat in summer. But a bombing?

I speak from some experience, as I was a radio news director in the city for the better part of three decades, and I just don’t remember one of those. One of the elements that makes this big news, of course, is that such things just aren’t supposed to happen in a place like Palm Springs.  But now that this unfortunate box has been checked, I have noticed a familiar pattern about the aftermath.

First, the news conferences put on by the authorities aren’t that much help, information-wise. “it’s under investigation.” In this case, the cops and city officials used a good portion of their time to send a “Palm Springs Strong” message. That may seem a little beside the point, but Palm Springs, while officially a city, is a small one, and a tight-knit community that needs to hear such things right now.

The next phase is, now that the deceased bomber’s name is known, every single moment of his life has become a subject of intense interest to determine a motive. There is usually a third thing, the “woulda, coulda, shoulda” phase, in which the goal is to find out what signals were missed before the incident and who missed them.

The really unusual part of this is, the perpetrator’s apparent motive for targeting an IVF facility. I must confess I was unfamiliar with the “anti-natalist” movement. Apparently, these are folks who believe that it’s cruel to bring a child into the world, who will only face suffering. Of all the demons that prompt someone to commit violent acts, these are the darkest I have ever heard of.

It should never have happened in Palm Springs, but it did. It’s just the latest reminder that such things can happen just about anywhere, and over time, probably will. But life, as they say, goes on, and we can be grateful for how many incidents like this don’t happen, not only because of the diligence of police investigators, but because neighbors and others in their own communities are able to see what’s coming and take action. I do enjoy the internet and social media – except when these seem to fuel fires that might otherwise burn themselves out.

 

Owning It

President Trump, who likes to surprise and shock, did it again by suggesting that the US should “own” the Gaza Strip and transform it into the Riviera of the Middle East after the immense damage caused by Israel’s war with Hamas. His idea has not been received well by countries in the region – especially the part about moving almost two million Palestinians out of the territory while the rubble is cleaned up.

It's useful to remember that among the roles Mr. Trump had before he was President was that of developer. Developers are drawn to see opportunity where there is a depressed area. The only problem with such ideas is that there are often people in the way. You might think, as Mr. Trump does, that those who lived in Gaza before the war could not possibly want to stay there now amid all the rubble. Except that’s what many are doing, as it’s their home. They can’t just leave forever.

Our country does own something: the responsibility for helping to rebuild Gaza. We might think that’s not our job. But among the debris on the ground that Gazan children are playing with are the remains of bombs with “Made in the USA” on them, or words to that effect, as we supplied many of the bombs Israel has dropped during the war. At the very least, it’s a serious optics issue for us.

What Gaza needs is kind of a Marshall Plan, named after George C. Marshall, the American general and Secretary of State who put forth the idea of the US helping Western Europe recover from the ravages of World War II. Among the countries it benefited was our former enemy in that conflict, Germany. The goal was simply to help these places get back on their feet, not to take them over permanently.

I actually don’t have a problem with what appears to be part of Mr. Trump’s vision. Gaza’s long Mediterranean coastline is a valuable asset, and resort hotels being built on portions of it could be a significant source of income for the territory, or autonomous region, or enclave, whatever Gaza is called. Maybe someday it could be an independent country, preferably without Hamas in charge.

Does the Israeli-Palestinian conflict need a two-state solution? It almost could be three states, since the Palestinians in Gaza are said to be different from their brethren in the West Bank, and unified governance might be difficult. But let’s not get ahead of our skis, as they say – the war isn’t quite over yet.

Birthright

 

If you were born here, you are an American. That’s what the Constitution says, and that’s what a federal judge said in response to our new President’s attempt to eliminate birthright citizenship by executive order.

That judge is right. But if it were up to me, and I had a magic wand, I would add one wrinkle. Even if you were born here, when you turned 21, you would, if capable, have to take the same civics test given to immigrants seeking citizenship, which demands at least a minimal knowledge of how our country works. If you failed, you would have to take a civics course and try again.

Why would I even suggest such a thing? I think it’s because it appears to me that many of us who were born here believe that it makes us better than others who weren’t, especially where race is involved. But we can’t take credit for being born here. We were just lucky, or if you prefer, blessed.

The same, by the way, goes for race. I am Caucasian, but I had nothing to do with that. Before I was born, God did not show me a bunch of color swatches like in a paint store. I did not get to say, “I think I’ll go with beige today.”

My proposal has exclusions. Native Americans would not have to take the civics test. They were here first. Black people who are descendants of slaves would be excused from the requirement as well, because their ancestors were imported here against their will.

It may seem contradictory, but I would not have a problem with someone foreign-born being elected a US President. That individual would have to be a naturalized citizen for at least 25 years and would have to have resided here during that time. This would open the door to talented people with a love of this country who are currently shut out of the Presidential election process. Yes, it could open it up to bad people too, but history shows that the current US birth requirement hasn’t always produced the best results.

OK, calm down folks, these are just ideas I have been playing with in my head. It’s unlikely that anybody is going to change the law in the near future – amending the Constitution is difficult, and it should be. And my ideas would just call for more bureaucrats for administration anyway. But I have a persistent conviction that being American is more than just a question of geography.