The Vaxed and the Vaxed-Not

 

We could see this coming a mile off, and now it’s on our doorstep: the concept of vaccination passports: little things we can carry in our wallets or on our phones certifying that we have been fully vaccinated against COVID. They are the keys we may need to admit us to indoor businesses, schools, theaters, or outdoor concerts or sporting events – or even our jobs.

The UK government is actively moving forward with such a plan. In this country, New York has the Excelsior Pass, a phone app that allows people to display their vaccination status. Major retailers, airlines, schools and universities, and other groups are all working on versions of pa

Civil libertarians are already resisting the concept of passports and simply wouldn’t stand for them on a national level. In Florida, the governor is prohibiting businesses from requiring them.

I recognize that I’m speaking from privilege, because I have had my shots, but I’m in favor of the passport idea, even if only on a sub-government level. Business owners, for example, should have the right to determine what’s best for the safety of their clientele and employees. Prohibiting them from doing so seems anti-libertarian to me.

Yes, there is discrimination involved. People who have difficulty getting shots may feel like second-class citizens, but that situation is likely temporary, as we sort out access and supply issues.

What about those who simply refuse to get shots for various reasons, including religious ones? That is their choice, but that choice comes with real-world consequences and restrictions. They may at least need to show proof of a negative COVID test. For those who worry about being included in centralized databases, consider the ones you are already in. Do you have a smartphone or a computer, use social media, carry a driver’s license, or vote?

I think the answer is in the time factor. At some point, there will be an acceptable level of COVID, which will be called herd immunity, and maybe such passports will be unnecessary or secondary, or accepted as part of life. For the moment, though, what other reasonable choice do we really have, if we want to get back to something called normal?

 

The Rest...of the Story

Radio listeners of a certain age will hear in their heads the voice of the late Paul Harvey and his signature just-before-the-water-breaks pregnant pauses. He had an entire series called The Rest of the Story.

As we mourn the victims of the Georgia massage-parlor shootings, especially the Asians, there is a tendency to bundle this in with the dramatic increase in hate crimes against Asians, even to draw a direct line to the utterances of our former President. But in this particular crime, there are also other threads to pull on.

The current convention is to focus more on the victims and less on the accused, so that he won’t be glorified. But motives and circumstances leading up to crimes like this are also important. For example, this young man is said to have sought out rehabilitation for his sex addiction. He reportedly told police the shootings were his way of eliminating temptation.

As humans, we have to learn to take responsibility for our actions. But what level of guilt compels someone to act out in a violent way? Guilt can prompt an individual, especially an addicted one, to try to get rid of this nagging feeling by blaming it on the perceived outside cause. He had reportedly been a customer at one of these massage parlors.

What was he struggling with, why, and how? What moral and religious orientation was he raised with? How big an issue is sex addiction? Do we take it seriously, or treat it as a joke? Does this fellow have an “Asian thing” when it comes to sex? What is the special attraction of an Asian massage parlor, sometimes included in the names of such businesses?

And last, but not least, there’s that element that is all too familiar, in America, anyway: the gun. Should anyone, even if, or especially if, they are having a “bad day,” be able to buy a gun on that same day, as reported in this case?

Violence against Asians is not new. It has been going on for centuries, and is another chapter in our country’s sorry racial history. All I’m saying is that while there are many commonalities in crimes like the one in Georgia, there are also special issues involved, and we would do well to consider the rest of this sad story as an opportunity to learn more about them.

 

 

 

Hit Me with Your Best Two Shots

My wife and I got our first Moderna COVID shots this week. We had to be on the computer for a couple of hours before appointment slots opened. Others have had it much worse in this regard, so we were lucky. The shot was pretty painless and our left arms were a little sore for a couple of days, but that’s all there was to it.

OK,  so how do I REALLY feel? Well, I’m happy about the vaccine, of course, but must confess to a little guilt. All I had to do to qualify for my shot was be old, and therefore at risk. But aside from age, my life isn’t risky at all. I work from home, as I did even before COVID, and interact with very few people on the outside in person.

I have a relative who is just a couple of years younger than the minimum age for my vaccine tier. She works in a store, and while the clientele isn’t huge, she does have to serve different people every day. I would have been OK with surrendering my place in line to her, as I believe she’s in a much riskier space, but it doesn’t work that way.

This tier system is a form of discrimination. It will largely go away when the hundreds of millions of vaccine doses we keep hearing about become widely accessible. But then the real “fun” begins, discrimination-wise. The owner of a reopening business might decide that only those who can prove they have been fully vaccinated will be allowed to work there or enter the business as customers. You can’t discriminate on the basis of race, creed, gender, sexual orientation, etc., but what happens when perceived safety is a factor?

I’m also wondering what happens when COVID and all its variants end. After World War II, there was V-E and then V-J Day. Will there be a V-C  or a V-P Day, for “Coronavirus” or  “Pandemic”?  I think those acronyms have been taken, and I’m sure we’ll think of something else. But just because it’s over here, when is it over globally?

Then what? First off, will there be  an orgiastic explosion of the economy? Not everyone is financially challenged, they have money they haven’t been able to spend. What is a ticket to a ball game going to cost and how far in advance will we have to buy it, or to make an airline reservation or book a hotel room, or even go out to dinner, just to beat the ecstatic crowds reveling in liberation? And after that phase, what will so-called “normal” life be like?

There are a lot of bridges to be crossed up ahead, and I guess I’ll sleep better at night if I wait till we come to them, or at least, get a little closer.

 

 

It Was Not a Waste of Time

 

I am as happy as anyone glad to have Donald Trump out of office. But I’m also glad that the impeachment trial is over. We knew how it was going to end. That said, it was still important.

The House managers created a masterful argument that put most of the pieces of the January 6 Capitol attack together. Unlike the Mueller report, which took forever, the prosecution in this trial had only a couple of weeks to build a case, but they did it. We learned a lot from both of these efforts, even though neither produced a result satisfying to many of us.

Some fault the prosecution for caving on the issue of witnesses, but I agree with the conclusion that presenting them wouldn’t have changed anything – and actually WOULD have been a waste of time.

I also think it’s now a waste to be talking about what may have motivated the senators who voted “not guilty.” Were they afraid of being primaried, losing financial contributions, angering the violent elements of their base, or did they just overdose on Kool-Aid? It doesn’t matter now, the only thing that counted was their vote, and history will be their judges.

While I’m glad that Senator Mitch McConnell put his criticism of Mr. Trump into the record, there was something insulting about it. Before the impeachment trial, whose scheduling was largely in McConnell’s control, the majority of the Senate voted that the trial itself was Constitutional, even though Mr. Trump was out of office -- which meant that McConnell’s vote should have been based on the merits of the case, merits which he seemed to have agreed with.

Perhaps there is a basis for the dispute over the legal meaning of the word “incite” in considering what Trump did, but It all seems to fall under Bill Maher’s popular theme, “I don’t know it for a fact, but I know it’s true.” It WAS sufficiently proven for 57 senators – not enough to convict, but still a pretty good showing. Impeachment is supposed to be difficult. As for legal actions that can still be brought against Trump in Georgia and New York, it looks like he’s caught with smoking guns clearly in his hands.

At least now, the federal government can focus its full attention on still-looming crises. As for smoking guns, though, for those folks out there still interested in Civil War II, I hope President Biden and his team clearly communicate that while they’d rather not fight one, they are ready to defend our republic with any means necessary.