California Senator Dianne Feinstein may have put her foot in it up to the ankle as she introduced a bill that would shield journalists from criminal investigations related to their work. She made it clear that her measure was intended to protect real reporters, defined as those who draw a salary -- as opposed, I guess, to screwball bloggers with 10 or so faithful readers....er...like me.
There are lots of people out there who would love to be “real”
reporters and be paid a decent salary, though such positions are fewer and farther
between, as traditional news organizations that could actually pay salaries
have drastically shrunk.
But I do know what DiFi is trying to say. Now that
journalism has been democratized, anyone can have a platform, like the one I’m
standing on right now. Journalism is one of those professions that many people
think they can do without the least bit of training. They have eyes, ears,
noses, and may be plugged farther in than the lame-stream media people in the
big building down the street.
I used to work in a tourist town. Tourism involves promotion
and marketing, and it seemed that at every public meeting, somebody would stand
up and offer some whizbang magic bullet that would double the number of
visitors to town overnight, and wondered why those in the business didn’t have
the brains to see a solution that was right in front of them. It didn’t matter
that the head of the convention and visitors bureau in the city had a degree or
two in this subject, or that those running hotels actually had gone to a
university to study their industry, and might even have a decade or three of
experience in it.
Many parents are experts on how to educate children, and
wonder why their kids’ credentialed teachers can’t do it and why they pay taxes
to support overly compensated school district administrators, some of whom have
doctoral degrees. Or your great aunt has a family recipe that has healed what’s
ailing you a lot faster than the Harvard-educated doc with all those expensive
pills.
But isn’t there something to be said for journalists whose
passions have prodded them to get the training and put in the time practicing their
craft, who’ve been around the block a few times, know when they’re being
flim-flammed and where the bodies are buried, and have learned how to tell you
the stories you need to see, hear, or read? They probably wouldn’t be in that
profession over a period long enough to have acquired those skills unless
someone paid them along the way.
So Senator, I hear what you’re saying. But maybe there’s a better
way of saying it.
No comments:
Post a Comment