If you’ve been a news junkie for more than five minutes, you
are used to the fact that every kind of breaking story has a cycle. Mass
shootings are perfect examples. The shooting itself, the body count, the cops
taking out the suspect (if the suspect doesn’t save them the trouble), the
shocked survivors, the teary families, the heroes, the shooter’s bio and the search
for a motive – and the inevitable brief gun control debate. And then, nothing,
as our short attention spans move on to something else – until it all happens again.
Why do we keep seeing this movie?
The gun control debate itself has its own cycle. “Why do
people need to own semi-automatic weapons? The writers of the Second Amendment
didn’t know about modern firearms.” “But most gun owners are responsible, and
gun laws can’t keep up with technology. Crazies will always find a way, and if
the people in the crowd were armed, they could shoot back!” In the case of Las Vegas, there has been one
new step, the general agreement that bump stocks should be banned. Did you even
know what that was a month ago?
“Control” is a dirty word, but we accept it in most aspects
of life. Let’s take cars. We require licenses to drive them. To be “street
legal,” vehicles must meet certain standards. There are rules of the road, and
though cars and trucks are capable of high speed, we are not allowed to drive
them to that limit on a public highway, only a race track. We have to carry
insurance for them. Why is gun regulation so different?
You’ve heard the argument that if you want to control guns,
you have to change the culture, our Wild West heritage. It’s impossible, many
believe, to make guns unpopular here. But we have managed to do this with smoking
-- after many decades.
Gun control is NOT about banning guns. That will never work.
But there are things that can be done. They are not easy, and likely expensive.
First, a massive federal buy-back program. That approach worked in Australia.
Next, we do what we did with tobacco, tax the hell out of it. Every gun sale.
Every bullet, perhaps with the money going to shooting victims and their
families. How about a database that flags individuals who try to buy multiple
assault weapons?
Then there’s media’s role. Not just news coverage and talk
shows – Hollywood too. How are we covering shootings or portraying the use of
guns?
This stool has way more than three legs and making the
changes will take many small bits of legislation over time, perhaps by new
generations with new things to think about. This is another monument we have to
pull down, and it’s a heavy one indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment