For most Americans, it’s been a given that if you were born
here, you’re a citizen, no questions asked, end of story. The President has
floated the idea that he can put an end to that by executive order, even though
legal scholars say it’s in the Constitution and he can’t do it that way.
Birthright citizenship is a fairly widely accepted concept
in the world. In our case, If you’re born here, you don’t have to wait in line,
take history tests, or learn English, you’re American. In most cases, our
ancestors had to do the heavy lifting, making the trip here voluntarily, or in
many cases, involuntarily. For those born here to decide to put a hurdle in
front of future babies who enter the world on our soil just isn’t quite fair, is it? And wouldn’t it
be the worst paperwork nightmare ever? I see no justification for those of us
who only had to be born here to act superior. We had no control over it, and
can’t take credit for it. We were just lucky, and our first response, one would
think, would be gratitude.
I do have a problem, though, with one legal provision: that you have to be
born here to be President. It’s a romantic idea. But why should someone
foreign-born, who has taken the trouble to become a citizen, who loves this country
and considers it home, follows the principles we espouse, and is deemed to have
the necessary qualifications, be automatically excluded from the Presidency,
just because of an accident of birth?
Let’s stop this “anchor baby” talk. Heck, we might even take
it as a compliment that foreigners, including many who are talented and have
contributions to make, want to live
here. At the rate things are going, that might not always be the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment