The year seems to be getting underway with a focus on a hard but painfully necessary discussion about rape.
In India, the rape and murder of a young woman, allegedly by a gang of five men, has the entire country debating the status of women, while Stateside a similar incident is shining an unpleasant light on a small Ohio town and the prevailing attitudes not only about women, but about the status of high school football players in small towns.
These days, of course, reflections of such incidents surface in electronic form. Two high school footballers in Steubenville, Ohio, are being charged in the rape, but a recording of another player mocking the girl has gone viral on the Internet, betraying an attitude held not only by him but by others around him. Now, many are wondering whether the authorities are minimizing the incident to protect the football team.
There is always collateral damage with these things now. In Steubenville’s case, the attention being paid to this is earning the town an unsolicited label – not nearly as permanent as Aurora or Newtown, of course, but one that could leave a scar.
Many of us may be pleased with this country’s growing tolerance for such things as gay marriage, and we may think of ourselves in general as being pretty enlightened on issues of equality. But let’s remember that women have had the right to vote here for less than a century. And on a very basic level, when it comes to the question of how women function, men can still display a surprising level of ignorance. Some of them get elected to Congress.
Rape is a crime I don’t understand. I wasn’t raised with any particular focus on respecting women, but it wasn’t a problem: the women around me were always respected, and while society may have accorded them a different role, they were never considered “less than” anyone else. Why there are those who feel this way is something of a mystery to me, but if this seems enlightened, I can’t take any credit for it – that’s just the way it was when I was growing up.
But if rape is a crime of power, and not passion, as they say, it means those who commit it are simply afraid of losing what they think they have or believe they are owed. And yes, even in 2013, we do need to have a serous discussion about where such attitudes come from, and how we’re going to deal with them.
Showing posts with label football. Show all posts
Showing posts with label football. Show all posts
Monday, January 7, 2013
Monday, July 23, 2012
Unnecessary Roughness
While the late Coach Joe Paterno and several top Penn State administrators appear to be responsible for covering up unspeakable crimes attributed to Jerry Sandusky, I wonder why the NCAA needs to revise history.
On top of huge financial penalties, the organization has stripped the school of its gridiron victories between 1998 and 2011, the years when Paterno and others, according to the Freeh report, agreed to hide Sandusky’s child sex abuse activities to protect the football program from bad publicity. Perhaps someone reading this may have seen one of those games. Did Penn State win, or not?
Typically, colleges are penalized for recruiting violations, unethical favors for star players, letting team members skate on grades, etc. I’m trying to figure out how Sandusky’s alleged offenses, horrible as they were, affected the performance of Penn State teams.
Maybe you could say that if the crimes had been exposed early on, the coaching system would have been disrupted, as Joe Paterno would have been forced to name a new assistant and the school’s ability to field top teams in the wake of the publicity might have been impacted. So, continuing with business as usual would constitute an unfair advantage. That argument may work for you; I’m not sure it does for me.
The school has also been banned from bowl games and will lose scholarships, as well as shared revenue from college football seasons. And current players will be able to take their scholarships to other schools. Observers say it will be the better part of a decade before the football program is back on its feet again. Many are saying, “Fine, football’s too important in what’s supposed to be an academic institution.” Explain that to current students, faculty, alumni, and also the business people in a college town who depend on seasonal income from fans. And, of course, there’s the question of where the money’s going to come from to pay off the lawsuits. How exactly is the school supposed to recover?
All those former Penn State administrators who participated in this scandal should be stripped of all their assets; others who turned their heads in denial of the facts shouold be identified; and whoever’s in charge of hell can turn up the furnace in the section where Joe Paterno may be, and where perhaps Jerry Sandusky may join him. But once the cancer's removed, isn’t it time to stop the radiation?
On top of huge financial penalties, the organization has stripped the school of its gridiron victories between 1998 and 2011, the years when Paterno and others, according to the Freeh report, agreed to hide Sandusky’s child sex abuse activities to protect the football program from bad publicity. Perhaps someone reading this may have seen one of those games. Did Penn State win, or not?
Typically, colleges are penalized for recruiting violations, unethical favors for star players, letting team members skate on grades, etc. I’m trying to figure out how Sandusky’s alleged offenses, horrible as they were, affected the performance of Penn State teams.
Maybe you could say that if the crimes had been exposed early on, the coaching system would have been disrupted, as Joe Paterno would have been forced to name a new assistant and the school’s ability to field top teams in the wake of the publicity might have been impacted. So, continuing with business as usual would constitute an unfair advantage. That argument may work for you; I’m not sure it does for me.
The school has also been banned from bowl games and will lose scholarships, as well as shared revenue from college football seasons. And current players will be able to take their scholarships to other schools. Observers say it will be the better part of a decade before the football program is back on its feet again. Many are saying, “Fine, football’s too important in what’s supposed to be an academic institution.” Explain that to current students, faculty, alumni, and also the business people in a college town who depend on seasonal income from fans. And, of course, there’s the question of where the money’s going to come from to pay off the lawsuits. How exactly is the school supposed to recover?
All those former Penn State administrators who participated in this scandal should be stripped of all their assets; others who turned their heads in denial of the facts shouold be identified; and whoever’s in charge of hell can turn up the furnace in the section where Joe Paterno may be, and where perhaps Jerry Sandusky may join him. But once the cancer's removed, isn’t it time to stop the radiation?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)